| Project |
appreciability |
||
| 3-fold rc / rs bi-way of appreciability gary e. davis |
November 10, 2025 |
|---|
At best, one’s appreciative [1] receptiveness (rc) and [2] responsiveness (rs) enact [3] a mutuality (bi-way) of situated valuing which, at best, enhances one’s recurs- iveness (1—> 2—> 3—> 1) of appreciating (appreciability for) how and that actions and things show themselves from themselves (or, for things, as if from them- selves, which is implicitly modeled by common personification—primal through figurative regard—of what matters). While appreciating (feeling appreciation) shows ability to care, feeling appreci- ability (how one appreciates mutually) shows openness to reflectively care, maybe learning from the mutuality to care better, thus enhancing one’s appreciability. Meanwhile, there is one’s… |
| receptive (rc) appreciability: enactive, engaged openness (not casual subjecting); ideally, fully letting another’s action show its ownmost respon- siveness (bearing, presencing) in relation with one’s presence, granting an- other’s full showing in shared dwelling: truly there being the other/thing itself, thereby feeling with the other, in dwelling there, as if being the other (or “losing oneself” in dwelling with the thing). But ideality is always horizonal, relative to given time and capabilities. |
| responsive (rs) appreciability: aptness of bearing, which interprets relevantly (“realistically”), at best fruitfully. Yet, the preferred outcome of interaction is always at best mutually determined, pragmatic: relative to given or discovered relevance of scaled engagement, and relative to time available (working for the “time being”), which may involve interactive learning pro- cesses in a shared project-ivity which takes time by giving itself apt time, thanks to… |
| recursive mutuality of appreciating (timely fulfillment) which appreci- ably balances ideality and reality, near-term feasibility and long-term commitment. |
next—> high appreciability |
| Be fair. © 2025, gary e. davis |